BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//Philosophy events - ECPv6.17.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-ORIGINAL-URL:/philevents X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Philosophy events REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H X-Robots-Tag:noindex X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/London BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20200329T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20201025T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20210328T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20211031T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20220327T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20221030T010000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211108T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211108T110000 DTSTAMP:20211108T162309Z CREATED:20210810T191034Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211108T162309Z UID:10001359-1636363800-1636369200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Medieval Logic Seminar: Walter Segrave\, Insolubles DESCRIPTION: URL:/philevents/event/medieval-logic-seminar-17/ LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, 精东传媒\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom CATEGORIES:Medieval Logic Research Group END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211108T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211108T170000 DTSTAMP:20211108T162310Z CREATED:20210810T191046Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211108T162310Z UID:10001360-1636383600-1636390800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Metaphysics Seminar Frederik Andersen (University of 精东传媒) DESCRIPTION:Title: Logical Akrasia \n\nAbstract:聽The aim of this paper is two-fold. First\, it introduces the concept logical akrasia (by analogy to epistemic akrasia). Second\, it discusses how logical akrasia relates to the standards of epistemic rationality\, and in particular\, how logical akrasia might pose a challenge to the tenability of the controversial 铿亁ed point thesis. URL:/philevents/event/metaphysics-seminar-8/ LOCATION:A virtual seminar by Zoom\, The University\, 精东传媒\, KY16 9L\, United Kingdom CATEGORIES:Metaphysics and Logic group END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211109T120000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211109T140000 DTSTAMP:20211109T162309Z CREATED:20210811T190946Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211109T162309Z UID:10001361-1636459200-1636466400@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Language & Mind Seminar: Stefano Pugnaghi DESCRIPTION:Breckenridge & Magidor: 鈥楢rbitrary Reference鈥 URL:/philevents/event/language-and-mind-s1-10/ CATEGORIES:Language and Mind Seminar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211109T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211109T170000 DTSTAMP:20211109T162309Z CREATED:20210811T190946Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211109T162309Z UID:10001362-1636470000-1636477200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Conceptual Engineering Seminar 鈥 Elisabetta Lalumera (University of Bologna) DESCRIPTION: URL:/philevents/event/conceptual-engineering-seminar-19/ CATEGORIES:Conceptual Engineering Seminar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211110T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211110T160000 DTSTAMP:20211110T165312Z CREATED:20210831T171159Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211110T165312Z UID:10001398-1636556400-1636560000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Moral Philosophy Reading Group DESCRIPTION:Moral Philosophy Reading Group\nDescription: This group reads and discusses an article per week\, chosen by a different member each time. \nDay/time: Wednesdays 3pm to 4pm on Teams. \nOrganizer: Theron Pummer (tgp4). URL:/philevents/event/moral-philosophy-reading-group-69/ END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211110T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211110T180000 DTSTAMP:20211110T162309Z CREATED:20210812T190914Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211110T162309Z UID:10001363-1636560000-1636567200@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory Seminar: Colin Troesken DESCRIPTION:Colin Troesken will lead a discussion of Anne Eaton鈥檚 paper聽鈥楢 Lady on the Street but a Freak in the Bed鈥: On the Distinction Between Erotic Art and Pornography聽(abstract below). \nPlease be aware that the paper includes examples of the sorts of erotic art under discussion. As usual\, the discussion leader will provide a short summary of the paper and we encourage those who have not had time to read the paper in full to still participate in the discussion. \n\n\nTitle:聽鈥楢 Lady on the Street but a Freak in the Bed鈥: On the Distinction Between Erotic Art and Pornography \n\n\nAbstract:聽How\, if at all\, are we to distinguish between the works that we call 鈥榓rt鈥 and those that we call 鈥榩ornography鈥? This question gets a grip because from classical Greek vases and the frescoes of Pompeii to Renaissance mythological painting and sculpture to Modernist prints\, the European artistic tradition is chock-full of art that looks a lot like pornography. In this paper I propose a way of thinking about the distinction that is grounded in art historical considerations regarding the function of erotic images in 16 th -century Italy. This exploration suggests that the root of the erotic art/pornography distinction was鈥攁t least in this context鈥攃lass: in particular\, the need for a special category of unsanctioned illicit images arose at the very time when print culture was beginning to threaten elite privilege. What made an erotic representation exceed the boundaries of acceptability\, I suggest\, was not its extreme libidinosity but\, rather\, its widespread availability and\, thereby\, its threat to one of the mechanisms of sustaining class privilege. URL:/philevents/event/philosophy-and-social-theory-seminar-8/ CATEGORIES:Philosophy & Social Theory Arch茅 Seminar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211111T100000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211111T120000 DTSTAMP:20211111T162307Z CREATED:20210813T192433Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211111T162307Z UID:10001364-1636624800-1636632000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Super Special Seminar DESCRIPTION: URL:/philevents/event/super-special-seminar-15/ CATEGORIES:Super Special Seminar series END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211111T130000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211111T143000 DTSTAMP:20211111T162307Z CREATED:20210813T192434Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211111T162307Z UID:10001365-1636635600-1636641000@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar: Alessandra Tanesini (Cardiff) 鈥淭he alleged epistemic significance of silence\, silencing\, and the conversational norm of no silent rejections (NSR)鈥 DESCRIPTION:Abstract: In this talk I examine\, and rebut\, Goldberg鈥檚 (2020) arguments in favour of a conversational norm that would defeasibly entitle linguistic agents to presume that silence indicates assent (NSR). Using evidence from conversational analysis I show that Goldberg is wrong to claim that our linguistic communities de facto conform to this norm in conversation. Instead\, I argue that norms similar to NSR are temporarily enacted by means of exercitive speech acts. If this is right\, and contra Goldberg\, silencing is the function served by these norms rather than a product of NSR鈥檚 misapplication. Finally\, I argue that because of the bounded nature of human rationality\, we would not wish a system of human communication aiming at the epistemic goals of persuasion and the sharing of information to have NSR as one of its norms. URL:/philevents/event/epistemology-seminar-19/ CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211111T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211111T173000 DTSTAMP:20211111T165313Z CREATED:20210830T171139Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211111T165313Z UID:10001388-1636646400-1636651800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:CEPPA Talk 鈥 Jennifer Lackey (Northwestern University) DESCRIPTION:Title: 鈥淓pistemic Reparations and the Right to be Known鈥 \nAbstract: In this paper\, I provide an account of the epistemic significance of the phenomenon of 鈥渂eing known鈥 and the relationship it has to reparations that are distinctively epistemic. Drawing on a framework provided by the United Nations of the 鈥渞ight to know\,鈥 I argue that victims of gross violations and injustices not only have the right to know what happened\, but also the right to be known鈥攖o be a giver of knowledge to others about their own experiences. I show how such victims can suffer epistemic wrongs by being rendered invisible\, vilified or demonized\, or systematically distorted\, and that these ways of not being known demand epistemic reparations. While there are traditional reparations that are epistemic in nature\, such as memorialization and education\, I argue that there is a prior and arguably more important epistemic reparation鈥攌nowing victims of gross violations and injustices in the sense of bearing witness. I conclude by sketching an epistemological picture to underwrite this notion of epistemic reparations\, one that significantly expands the traditional picture by including epistemic duties that are imperfect in nature and concern actions in addition to beliefs. URL:/philevents/event/ceppa-talk-jennifer-lackey-northwestern-university/ CATEGORIES:CEPPA Talk ORGANIZER;CN="Jessica Brown":MAILTO:jab30@st-andrews.ac.uk END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20211111T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20211111T173000 DTSTAMP:20211111T162307Z CREATED:20211108T162311Z LAST-MODIFIED:20211111T162307Z UID:10001436-1636646400-1636651800@www.st-andrews.ac.uk SUMMARY:Epistemology Seminar (joint with CEPPA): Jennifer Lackey (Northwestern) 鈥淓pistemic Reparations and the Right to be Known鈥 DESCRIPTION:Abstract: In this paper\, I provide an account of the epistemic significance of the phenomenon of 鈥渂eing known鈥 and the relationship it has to reparations that are distinctively epistemic. Drawing on a framework provided by the United Nations of the 鈥渞ight to know\,鈥 I argue that victims of gross violations and injustices not only have the right to know what happened\, but also the right聽to be known鈥攖o be a giver of knowledge to others about their own experiences. I show how such victims can suffer epistemic wrongs by being rendered invisible\, vilified or demonized\, or systematically distorted\, and that these ways of not being known demand epistemic reparations. While there are traditional reparations that are epistemic in nature\, such as memorialization and education\, I argue that there is a prior and arguably more important epistemic reparation鈥攌nowing victims of gross violations and injustices in the sense of bearing witness. I conclude by sketching an epistemological picture to underwrite this notion of epistemic reparations\, one that significantly expands the traditional picture by including epistemic duties that are imperfect in nature and concern actions in addition to beliefs. URL:/philevents/event/epistemology-seminar-joint-with-ceppa-jennifer-lackey-northwestern-epistemic-reparations-and-the-right-to-be-known/ CATEGORIES:Epistemology Seminar END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR