• Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Roy Sorensen (UT Austin and University of ¾«¶«´«Ã½)

    Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams

    Title: Seeing Holes-without seeing what they are holes in Abstract: Peering down into a tall box, you see a ring. The ring is removed. To your surprise this uncovers a second duplicate ring. Did you see the hole of the bottom ring before you saw the bottom ring? Each answer is backed by good reasons.…

  • Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Zoé McConaughey (University of Lille)

    Online Meeting via Teams

    Title: History of logic as a tool for exploring the plurality of logical frameworks Abstract: I will outline another type of logical pluralism than the one now famously proposed by Beall and Restall (2006). I will argue that in addition to paying attention to particular logics, such as classical, intuitionnistic, relevance logics, etc., it is…

  • Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Sabina Domínguez Parrado (University of ¾«¶«´«Ã½ and University of Amsterdam)

    Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams

    Title: A New Problem for Logical Contextualism Abstract: Logical contextualism is the view that ‘valid’ is a context-sensitive expression. One key reason to endorse logical contextualism is that, unlike traditional forms of logical pluralism, it can avoid the so-called collapse problem. Logical contextualism relies on the crucial assumption that each conversational context determines a uniquely appropriate logical consequence…

  • Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Hannes Leitgeb (MCMP)

    Title: When Rules Define Logical Operators: Rules as Second-Order Definitions Abstract: Logical inferentialists hold that the meaning of logical operators is given by their rules of inference. Arthur Prior cast doubt on this by introducing rules for his so-called tonk operator that seemed to allow for the derivation of any sentence whatsoever from any sentence…

  • Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Isaac Wilhelm (National University of Singapore)

    Title: Talk About Types Abstract: Many metaphysical theories of identity, existence, and so on, are formulated using higher-order languages like the simply typed lambda calculus. But as I argue, for the purposes of metaphysical theorizing, a different language would be better: the calculus of constructions. Since this language—like many pure type systems—allows for quantification over…

  • Metaphysics and Logic Seminar x FPST Seminar: Marta Sznajder (University of Vienna)

    Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams

    Janina Hosiasson’s logic of rational degrees of belief: subjective probability before and after Ramsey Abstract: In 1931, Janina Hosiasson-Lindenbaum proposed a proto-decision-theoretic answer to the value of evidence problem, originally posed by C. D. Broad and eventually solved by I. J. Good in the context of Savage’s decision theory. As an influence on her paper…

  • Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Shawn Simpson (University of Pittsburgh)

    Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams

    Title: ‘Logic and Inference in the Sender-Receiver Model’ Abstract: Logic, inference, language – somehow these are all connected. But how? One of David Lewis’s goals in his book Convention (1969) was to answer this question. There, he presented what is now known as the sender-receiver model of communication, and he revealed how conventionally meaningful communication might come about.…

  • Metaphysics and Logic Seminar: Greg Restall (¾«¶«´«Ã½)

    Edgecliffe G03 and via MS Teams

    Title: What do we mean? Semantics, Practices and Pluralism   Abstract: In this informal talk, I will revisit some longstanding issues in philosophical logic in the light of some contemporary developments.    The longstanding issues? (1) Michael Dummett’s challenge in The Logical Basis of Metaphysics to the effect that to get anywhere in fundamental issues of metaphysics we would do…